On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 17:57 +0800, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701. > > > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > > Okay, I pushed my arm/mediatek branch to my tree at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu.git > > Please base the patch on that branch and re-send. > I think it is better let Mediatek SoC maintainer Matthias to accept dtsi patch like other drivers. This can avoid dtsi conflict. As I remember,last time MT8173 IOMMU dtsi patch accepted in iommu tree and mt8173.dtsi had conflict with arm soc tree at the merge window. Honghui should resend this patch to Matthias, and elaborate your dependency with clock and power domain dtsi, then Matthias know the merge sequence. Eddie Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
