On 2016-06-21 08:55, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> Add the device tree documentation for all the supported parts. Apart the
> compatible string and standard I2C binding, no other binding is currently
> needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/iio/potentiometer/mcp4531.txt | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/potentiometer/mcp4531.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/potentiometer/mcp4531.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/potentiometer/mcp4531.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b052299
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/potentiometer/mcp4531.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> +* Microchip MCP453X/454X/455X/456X/463X/464X/465X/466X Digital Potentiometer
> + driver
> +
> +The node for this driver must be a child node of a I2C controller, hence
> +all mandatory properties for your controller must be specified. See directory:
> +
> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c
> +
> +for more details.
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible: Must be one of the following, depending on the
> + model:
> + "microchip,mcp4531-502"
> + "microchip,mcp4531-103"
> + "microchip,mcp4531-503"
*snip*
I'm not directly opposed, but I have used the following and DT booting
works like a charm here.
mcp4651-104@28 {
compatible = "mcp4651-104";
reg = <0x28>;
};
But, I suppose some DT documentation is not bad, and my understanding of
the device instantiation process and the i2c/dt interactions are not
complete, so my DT snippet might be an abomination? I'll leave the
decision if this is needed to someone with more experience on how other
drivers handle this.
Cheers,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
