On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > So that callers of cros_ec_cmd_xfer don't have to repeat boilerplate > code when checking for errors from the EC side. > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v3: > * successfully spell success > > v2: > * no change > --- > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c > index b6e161f71b26..ecc544c728f0 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c > @@ -380,3 +380,18 @@ int cros_ec_cmd_xfer(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_cmd_xfer); > + > +int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > + struct cros_ec_command *msg) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer(ec_dev, msg); > + if (ret < 0) > + dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "Command xfer error (err:%d)\n", ret); > + else if (msg->result != EC_RES_SUCCESS) > + return -EECRESULT - msg->result; I have been wondering about the error return codes here, and if they should be converted to standard Linux error codes. For example, I just hit error -1003 with a driver I am working on. This translates to EC_RES_INVALID_PARAM, or, in Linux terms, -EINVAL. I think it would be better to use standard error codes, especially since some of the errors are logged. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html