On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:15:36PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > If an IOMMU node is present in the DT but marked as disabled, we should > avoid trying to do anything with it. We currently sort-of get away with > this by virtue of a disabled device probably not having called > of_iommu_set_ops(), but that is hardly safe to rely upon in general, and > either way we don't want to treat it as an error condition with the > resulting "Failed to initialise IOMMU" message. What's the use-case for this? I ask because epapr says that the device binding should provide details as to exactly what "disabled" means for that device. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
