On 2016/6/8 6:44, Douglas Anderson wrote:
There's no reason to store the return value of rockchip_emmc_phy_power()
in a variable nor to check it. Just return it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
index 0fce7359d468..188e4c387ba8 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
@@ -227,8 +227,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
{
I saw the cleanup for power_off is done on [patch 9/11]
shouldn't be in this patch? :)
struct rockchip_emmc_phy *rk_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
- int ret = 0;
-
/* Drive impedance: 50 Ohm */
regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
@@ -252,11 +250,7 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
PHYCTRL_OTAPDLYSEL_SHIFT));
/* Power up emmc phy analog blocks */
- ret = rockchip_emmc_phy_power(phy, PHYCTRL_PDB_PWR_ON);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- return 0;
+ return rockchip_emmc_phy_power(phy, PHYCTRL_PDB_PWR_ON);
}
static const struct phy_ops ops = {
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
