On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:36:47 -0800, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 21, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Unlike other build products in the Linux kernel, there is no 'make
> >> *install' mechanism to put devicetree blobs in a standard place.
> >>
> >> This patch is an attempt to fix this problem. Akin to 'make install',
> >> this creates a new make target, dtbs_install. The script that gets
> >> called defers to a distribution or user supplied installdtbs binary,
> >> if found in the system. Otherwise, the default action is to install a
> >> given dtb into
> >>
> >> /boot/devicetrees/${kernel_version}/${dts_filename}.dtb
>
> Random bikeshed of the day. Maybe this was already covered in the long
> thread and just tell me to shut up and go away if it was and I'm not
> presenting new arguments:
>
> I like this whole approach, but I'm all for shorter pathnames as long
> as they are unique. Also, keeping it below 8 can be useful for FAT
> /boot filesystems. I propose /boot/dtb/ instead.
Makes sense to me.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
