Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2016, 09:10 +0200 schrieb Gregory CLEMENT: > Given its name the voltage_switch() should be called for any > voltage. However currently it is only called for the 1.8V case. > > That means that the current implementation of the callback could have > made this assumption. In order to not adding a regression when the > voltage_switch() function will be called for the other voltage > targets, > this patch ensure that the code of the current callback won't be > executed > for the other case than 1.8V. > This isn't necessary, it's fine to re-execute the pad calibration for any voltage switch. Regards, Lucas > Cc: Lucas Stach <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci- > tegra.c > index bcc0de47fe7e..01f58296125e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c > @@ -302,6 +302,10 @@ static void tegra_sdhci_voltage_switch(struct > sdhci_host *host) > struct sdhci_tegra *tegra_host = > sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); > const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data *soc_data = tegra_host- > >soc_data; > > + /* initially this function was called only for the 1.8V case > */ > + if (host->mmc->ios.signal_voltage != MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) > + return; > + > if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_HAS_PADCALIB) > tegra_host->pad_calib_required = true; > } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
