On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:29:44PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > Personally, I think the issue of ACPI support should be taken on a > patch-by-patch basis. A lot of the things that need to be done are quite > discrete and fairly well contained. If the patches don't look that way > then push back on them. For the parts that look ready, go ahead and > merge it. Push back on the ones that don't. I think the most valuable thing in ACPI is the static data tables. Things like BERT, EINJ, HEST, MPST and the various other bits of RAS functionality have value in the ARM world, and being able to share the implementation is a benefit. But that can be implemented without worrying about using ACPI for device discovery or interfacing. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
