On 05/26/2016 02:46 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Gabriel Fernandez
<gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 25 May 2016 at 19:24, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:41:23AM +0200, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
This patch allows fine tuning of the quads FS for audio clocks
accuracy.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Bideau <olivier.bideau@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,flexgen.txt | 1 +
drivers/clk/st/clk-flexgen.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,flexgen.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,flexgen.txt
index b7ee5c7..15b33c7 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,flexgen.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,flexgen.txt
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ This binding uses the common clock binding[2].
Required properties:
- compatible : shall be:
"st,flexgen"
+ "st,stih407-clkgend0", "st,flexgen" (enable clock propagation on parent)
What do "d0" and "d2" refer to?
This seems to indicate you have too much clock detail in the DT (with
individual clocks described) or not enough with genericish compatible
strings. What happens for the mext clock you need to adjust the flags
on? You should be able to make these adjustments without DT updates.
Perhaps you need a wider fixing of clock compatible strings.
Rob
Sorry i sent my response in html...
Hi Rob,
Thanks for reviewing.
Can i remove
"
st,stih407-clkgend0" & "
st,stih407-clkgend2" compatible strings and add proprieties instead ?
I only need to activate 2 features and then we can keep generic
compatible strings.
Hi Rob,
That is no different and suffers the same point I raised. It requires
updating the DT for any clock configuration change or enhancement.
Agree with you, DT update is needed as soon as a clock configuration
should be changed. This is due to STiH clock driver design based on DT
description of SoC clock tree.
This clock driver was accepted 2 years ago. At the time being there was
discussion about clock tree description location: driver or DT.
Bad choice was done for this driver...
If we decide to redesign STiH clock driver using in-driver clock tree
description, this will modify STiH clock DT nodes description and so
break DT backward compatibility.
What's from your pov the best option?
Regards,
Loic
Rob
_______________________________________________
Kernel mailing list
Kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
