Hi Rich, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you really do want a lot more detail for SMP-related bindings, I > could consider submitting a version with SMP omitted for now (since > the kernel patches submitted at this point don't include SMP) and do > the addition of SMP as a separate patch later. But with the launch of > open-hardware boards capable of running SMP J2 systems (see > https://twitter.com/jcoreeng/status/730330848306700288) near, I'd like > to be getting bindings we can use stabilized so that we're properly > including DTB in the boot rom and not relying on external DTB files or > linking DTB in kernel. Submitting a version now without SMP is indeed a good idea, and allows to move forward. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
