On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:10:04PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:22:46 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:21:46PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:20:47AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > By "That" are you referring to extending the standard for compatible > > > > strings to the board level, or forcing consistent naming on the dts > > > > files? > > > > > > A consistent file naming on both the dtb and dts files. > > > > It's time to knock the idea of naming the DT blobs after the compatible > > string on its head as well. That's really not going to work. Just > > leave the filenames as is, and move the problem into userspace to solve. > > > [...] > > > > Just use the filenames we already have in the kernel tree. Let userspace > > parse the DT blobs for the compatible strings - it can then provide the > > user with the choice of all and _also_ show that certain of DT blobs > > may be compatible with a range of boards as well. > > Yes, the consistent filename format is a non-problem. The files that > exist already have names. Nothing else is going to use them. Done. Grant, you have the wrong end of the stick. This discussion is about what happens when files from $(objtree)/arch/arm/boot/dts get installed into /lib/modules/$(kernelversion)/... and their renaming from the filenames we already have in arch/arm/boot/dts to a filename generated from the compatible string. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
