On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:03:48PM +0200, Christer Weinigel wrote: > On 05/24/2016 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > I'm not sure this is something we want to support at all, I can't > > immediately see anything that does this deliberately in the SPI > > code and obviously the "bus number" is something of a Linux > > specific concept which would need some explanation if we were going > > to document it. It's something I'm struggling a bit to see a > > robust use case for that isn't better served by parsing sysfs, > > what's the goal here? > If this isn't something that should be in the Documentation/devicetree > because it's not generig enough, where should Linux-specific > interpretations such as this be documented? I'm not clear that we want to document this at all since I am not clear that there is a sensible use case for doing it. I did ask for one but you've not articulated one in this reply. I am much less gung ho than Grant on this one, even as a Linux specific interface it seems very legacy.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
