On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:15:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:59:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > > > > How about allowing to embed eBPF bytecode in the DT that can be installed as > > > a constraint set? This would allow maximum for flexibility and also make the > > > implementation a lot easier. > > > > That seems somewhat Linux specific, I'd like to see some DT maintainer > > buy in on that one as well as Takashi's thoughts. > > I am very much not in favour of embedding eBPF bytecode into the DT. +1 What's wrong with Forth? ;) Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
