On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:29:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Fusté wrote: > There is nothing PCM5102A specific here, and it is pretty generic. > Wouldn't it be better to write instead a simple-i2s-codec for all the > classics I2S "hifi" DACs which will get the I2S/DAI parameters from DT ? > PCM510x, PCM5122 in HW mode, ES9023, a bunch of ES90xx implementations > etc... will use exactly the same code with only format and rate variation. > And for the rate, it is implementation dependent, even in the case of > pcm5102a. If we do that then we have no idea what the hardware actually is and we're creating more effort on the DT side, the DT has to specify all the parameters for the device rather than just the name. Given how trivial the code is it's not clear that this is a win.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
