Re: ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:45:19 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:21:54PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> > ahh, ok.  Yeah, we do need some way to make this easier, as it is a
> > too-common pattern.  I do think we do need a way to know if something
> > is missing because it isn't there vs it hasn't been probed yet.  Ie.
> > late_initcall() is not the awesome solution.
> 
> On this topic, I now have a solution to this which is not DRM specific,
> nor is it DT specific.
> 
> It's a core piece of code which gathers up the struct device pointers,
> and a callback for the master device to assemble the components and
> indicate when the master is complete.

That's pretty clean. I think that will work nicely.

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux