On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rob, Mark, > > On 11/05/16 17:30, Rob Herring wrote: > > A platform driver for just gic-400 is wrong IMO until we have platform > > drivers for all interrupt controllers. > > Yes, that is fine with me, but can we decide on whether the platform > driver should match "tegra210-agic" or the early driver should bail-out > if clocks/power-domains are present? > > I am fine with either, but I think that Rob prefers the tegra210-agic > compat string and Mark prefers to bail-out of the early driver if > clocks/power-domains are present. If anything, I wasn't too keen on bailing out becuase of those properties, as I mentioned for the case of a root interrupt controller. I am happy to match the "tegra210-agic" string specifically. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
