Make it possible to name the producer side of a GPIO line using
a "gpio-line-names" property array, modeled on the
"clock-output-names" property from the clock bindings.
This naming is especially useful for:
- Debugging: lines are named after function, not just opaque
offset numbers.
- Exploration: systems where some or all GPIO lines are available
to end users, such as prototyping, one-off's "makerspace usecases"
users are helped by the names of the GPIO lines when tinkering.
This usecase has been surfacing recently.
The gpio-line-names attribute is completely optional.
Example output from lsgpio on a patched Snowball tree:
GPIO chip: gpiochip6, "8000e180.gpio", 32 GPIO lines
line 0: unnamed unused
line 1: "AP_GPIO161" "extkb3" [kernel]
line 2: "AP_GPIO162" "extkb4" [kernel]
line 3: "ACCELEROMETER_INT1_RDY" unused [kernel]
line 4: "ACCELEROMETER_INT2" unused
line 5: "MAG_DRDY" unused [kernel]
line 6: "GYRO_DRDY" unused [kernel]
line 7: "RSTn_MLC" unused
line 8: "RSTn_SLC" unused
line 9: "GYRO_INT" unused
line 10: "UART_WAKE" unused
line 11: "GBF_RESET" unused
line 12: unnamed unused
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Mandala <david.mandala@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lee Campbell <leecam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
ChangeLog v3->v4:
- Do not use the bool accessor to see if a line is there, use
the return value from counting the strings to bail out if
<= 0.
- Augment the naming loop to be smarter.
- Merging this now as there is no further feedback from the DT
people in weeks.
ChangeLog v2->v3:
- Swap "gpio-names" for "gpio-line-names" as "gpio-names" indicate
a consumer endpoint in DT terminology.
- Index to either:
(A) The end of the gpio-names array or
(B) ngpios
So we don't risk going out of bounds on either
ChangeLog v1->v2:
- Make the naming function return void: we continue at all times
and always return 0 anyway.
- Fix a return value check.
This has been discussed at some length now.
Why we are not using hogs: these are consumer side, not producer
side. The gpio-controller in DT (gpio_chip in Linux) is a
producer, not a consumer.
This patch is not about assigning initial values to GPIO lines.
That is an orthogonal usecase. This is just about naming lines.
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 19 ++++++++++
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
index c88d2ccb05ca..68d28f62a6f4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
@@ -152,6 +152,21 @@ additional bitmask is needed to specify which GPIOs are actually in use,
and which are dummies. The bindings for this case has not yet been
specified, but should be specified if/when such hardware appears.
+Optionally, a GPIO controller may have a "gpio-line-names" property. This is
+an array of strings defining the names of the GPIO lines going out of the
+GPIO controller. This name should be the most meaningful producer name
+for the system, such as a rail name indicating the usage. Package names
+such as pin name are discouraged: such lines have opaque names (since they
+are by definition generic purpose) and such names are usually not very
+helpful. For example "MMC-CD", "Red LED Vdd" and "ethernet reset" are
+reasonable line names as they describe what the line is used for. "GPIO0"
+is not a good name to give to a GPIO line. Placeholders are discouraged:
+rather use the "" (blank string) if the use of the GPIO line is undefined
+in your design. The names are assigned starting from line offset 0 from
+left to right from the passed array. An incomplete array (where the number
+of passed named are less than ngpios) will still be used up until the last
+provided valid line index.
+
Example:
gpio-controller@00000000 {
@@ -160,6 +175,10 @@ gpio-controller@00000000 {
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
ngpios = <18>;
+ gpio-line-names = "MMC-CD", "MMC-WP", "VDD eth", "RST eth", "LED R",
+ "LED G", "LED B", "Col A", "Col B", "Col C", "Col D",
+ "Row A", "Row B", "Row C", "Row D", "NMI button",
+ "poweroff", "reset";
}
The GPIO chip may contain GPIO hog definitions. GPIO hogging is a mechanism
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index d81dbd8e90d9..d22dcc38179d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -196,6 +196,51 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_parse_own_gpio(struct device_node *np,
}
/**
+ * of_gpiochip_set_names() - set up the names of the lines
+ * @chip: GPIO chip whose lines should be named, if possible
+ */
+static void of_gpiochip_set_names(struct gpio_chip *gc)
+{
+ struct gpio_device *gdev = gc->gpiodev;
+ struct device_node *np = gc->of_node;
+ int i;
+ int nstrings;
+
+ nstrings = of_property_count_strings(np, "gpio-line-names");
+ if (nstrings <= 0)
+ /* Lines names not present */
+ return;
+
+ /* This is normally not what you want */
+ if (gdev->ngpio != nstrings)
+ dev_info(&gdev->dev, "gpio-line-names specifies %d line "
+ "names but there are %d lines on the chip\n",
+ nstrings, gdev->ngpio);
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure to not index beyond the end of the number of descriptors
+ * of the GPIO device.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < gdev->ngpio; i++) {
+ const char *name;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_string_index(np,
+ "gpio-line-names",
+ i,
+ &name);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret != -ENODATA)
+ dev_err(&gdev->dev,
+ "unable to name line %d: %d\n",
+ i, ret);
+ break;
+ }
+ gdev->descs[i].name = name;
+ }
+}
+
+/**
* of_gpiochip_scan_gpios - Scan gpio-controller for gpio definitions
* @chip: gpio chip to act on
*
@@ -445,6 +490,10 @@ int of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
if (status)
return status;
+ /* If the chip defines names itself, these take precedence */
+ if (!chip->names)
+ of_gpiochip_set_names(chip);
+
of_node_get(chip->of_node);
return of_gpiochip_scan_gpios(chip);
--
2.4.11
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
