Hello Krzysztof, On 05/08/2016 03:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Just like clock driver for Exynos542x/5800, provide the fixed clock here > so the clock bindings and their consumers would be consistent and > similar. > > However a clock named "fin_pll" is already provided by generic > fixed-clock and it is both referenced in the clock driver (by name) and > in DT (by phandle). To make the transition smooth, first introduce the > new external fixed clock here under temporary, different name and switch > internal users to it. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- [snip] > > +/* Same as in Exynos5420 */ > +static const struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] __initconst = { > + { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-oscclk", .data = (void *)0, }, Since using designated initializers, I was about to say that there is no need to explicitly set .data to 0 since omitted fields are implicitly initialized... > + { }, > +}; > + > /* register exynos5410 clocks */ > static void __init exynos5410_clk_init(struct device_node *np) > { > @@ -192,6 +204,10 @@ static void __init exynos5410_clk_init(struct device_node *np) > > ctx = samsung_clk_init(np, reg_base, CLK_NR_CLKS); > > + samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(ctx, exynos5x_fixed_rate_ext_clks, > + ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5x_fixed_rate_ext_clks), > + ext_clk_match); > + ... but then I noticed that .data is used as exynos5x_fixed_rate_ext_clks array index in samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(). So makes sense to set it explicitly to make the intent clear. Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html