On 05/05/2016 10:10 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 05/05/2016 08:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Parse usb-pwrseq property from Device Tree to get the phandle to pwrseq >> device. The pwrseq device will be used by USB hub to cycle the power >> before activating ports. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > [snip] > >> >> @@ -532,6 +534,14 @@ int usb_hub_create_port_device(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1) >> return retval; >> } >> >> + port_dev->dev.of_node = usb_of_get_child_node(hub->hdev->dev.of_node, port1); >> + port_dev->pwrseq = pwrseq_alloc(&port_dev->dev); >> + if (IS_ERR(port_dev->pwrseq)) { >> + device_unregister(&port_dev->dev); >> + /* TODO: what about EPROBE_DEFER? */ > > I think it's OK since the call chain is: > > hub_probe() > hub_configure() > usb_hub_create_port_device() > > so the hub_probe() will be deferred if the usb-pwrseq was not registered yet. > Unless I misunderstood your question :) > > Anyway, patch looks good to me: > > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Yes and deferred probing works in my case. That is an older comment actually. Thanks for review, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html