On 05/05/16 16:50, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 15:32 -0700, Tyrel Datwyler wrote: >> On 04/27/2016 10:34 PM, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote: >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c >>> index ceb18d3..a560a98 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c >>> @@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ static int update_dt_node(__be32 phandle, s32 scope) >>> break; >>> >>> case 0x80000000: >>> - prop = of_find_property(dn, prop_name, NULL); >>> - of_remove_property(dn, prop); >>> + of_remove_property(dn, of_find_property(dn, >>> + prop_name, NULL)); >>> prop = NULL; >>> break; >>> >> You haven't removed a NULL check here, as suggested by the changelog, >> but instead made a cosmetic change to the code that still leaves behind >> a now unnecessary "prop = NULL;" to bit rot. > Yeah I think you're right. Though it's not very clear how prop is used in that > function. > > Please one of you send me an incremental to remove the prop = NULL; > > cheers > Resend of previous message due to formatting issues: I didn't delete the prop = NULL; initially as I didn't fully understand how it was used in the rest of the function and the effect of deleting it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
