On 4 May 2016 at 20:53, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/05/16 10:28, Dan Haab wrote: >> Luxul XAP-1510 is an AP device based on BCM4708 SoC. It uses flash >> memory connected to the SPI controller. > > Looks fine, except one nit: > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xap-1510.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xap-1510.dts >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..f4460b5 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xap-1510.dts >> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ >> +/* >> + * Broadcom BCM470X / BCM5301X ARM platform code. >> + * DTS for Luxul XAP-1510 >> + * >> + * Copyright 2015 Luxul Inc. >> + * >> + * Licensed under the GNU/GPL. See COPYING for details. > > The ARM SoC maintainer have been asking to utilize a license which is > also BSD compatible, so something along the lines of this one: > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm911360k.dts > > Do you mind respining the patch to include that kind of license header? I wasn't aware of this neither. Shall we re-license existing DTS files as well? I'm fine with changing them to BSD compatible. I'm a bit confused by using BSD license only. Kernel is licensed under GNU GPL version 2 and if there are some BSD compatible modules, they use dual licensing model (BSD/GPL). Shouldn't we use BSD/GPL in DTS files as well then? -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
