Am Dienstag, 26. April 2016, 10:36:46 schrieb Jianqun Xu:
> This patch add rk3399-evb.dts for RK3399 evaluation board.
> Tested on RK3399 evb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> changes in v3:
> - add more compatible (Doug)
> - add modle
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb.dts | 125
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile index df37865..7037a16 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3368-evb-act8846.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3368-geekbox.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3368-r88.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-evb.dtb
>
> always := $(dtb-y)
> subdir-y := $(dts-dirs)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb.dts new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c3370bd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2016 Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> + *
> + * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
> + * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
> + * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
> + * whole.
> + *
> + * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
> + * License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * Or, alternatively,
> + *
> + * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
> + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
> + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
> + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
> + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
> + * conditions:
> + *
> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> + * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
> + * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
> + * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
> + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
> + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +#include <dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h>
> +#include "rk3399.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Rockchip RK3399 Evaluation Board";
> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-evb", "rockchip,rk3399",
> + "google,rk3399evb-rev2", google,rk3399evb-rev1",
> + "google,rk3399evb-rev0" ;
can you check against which compatibles that coreboot really matches?
As we said that the evb changed between rev1 and rev2, I would expect the
compatible to be something like
compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-evb", "google,rk3399evb-rev2",
"rockchip,rk3399";
leaving out the rev1 and rev0
> +
> + vdd_center: vdd-center {
> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
> + pwms = <&pwm3 0 25000 0>;
> + regulator-name = "vdd_center";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + status = "okay";
> + };
Can you check if this runs stable with the pwm-regulator in mainline please?
I.e. Boris' rework series hasn't landed yet and at least on Veyron I remember
the pwm-regulator having reliability issues or something like that.
> +
> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pwm0 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&pwm2 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&pwm3 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&uart2 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_host0_ehci {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_host0_ohci {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_host1_ehci {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_host1_ohci {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&pinctrl {
> + pmic {
> + pmic_int_l: pmic-int-l {
> + rockchip,pins =
> + <1 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
> + };
> +
> + pmic_dvs2: pmic-dvs2 {
> + rockchip,pins =
> + <1 18 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
