On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Hello Mark, > > do you think that this patch addresses your previous comments > (http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=145926913008544&w=2) appropriately? > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: > > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > When it's a Xen domain0 booting with ACPI, it will supply a /chosen and > > a /hypervisor node in DT. So check if it needs to enable ACPI. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c > > index d1ce8e2..57ee317 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c > > @@ -67,10 +67,15 @@ static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node, > > { > > /* > > * Return 1 as soon as we encounter a node at depth 1 that is > > - * not the /chosen node. > > + * not the /chosen node, or /hypervisor node with compatible > > + * string "xen,xen". > > */ > > - if (depth == 1 && (strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0)) > > - return 1; > > + if (depth == 1 && (strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0)) { > > + if (strcmp(uname, "hypervisor") != 0 || > > + !of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "xen,xen")) > > + return 1; > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > } Is the duplicate node checking logic I mentioned in that review gone? i.e. do we not need an is_xen_node() helper? Additionally, IMO, this would be easier to follow without the nested conditionals, e.g. static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node, const char *uname, int depth, void *data) { /* * Ignore anything not directly under the root node; we'll * catch its parent instead. */ if (depth != 1) return 0; if (strcmp(uname, "chosen") == 0) return 0; if (strcmp(uname, "hypervisor") == 0 && of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "xen,xen")) return 0; /* * This node at depth 1 is neither a chosen node nor a xen node, * which we do not expect. */ return 1; } Otherwise, this looks fine to me. FWIW, either way: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> As this is core arm64 code, I believe you'll need acks from Catalin and/or Will (and likewise for patch 15), unless I've missed those. Thanks, Mark. > > > > @@ -184,7 +189,8 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void) > > /* > > * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless > > * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or > > - * - the device tree is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node) > > + * - the device tree is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node, > > + * and a /hypervisor node when running on Xen) > > * and ACPI has not been force enabled (acpi=force) > > */ > > if (param_acpi_off || > > -- > > 2.0.4 > > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
