On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 15:35 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > No. It is correct for of_find_by_name() to call of_node_put() for > the from argument. The callers should be fixed. I would argue that if everybody makes the same mistake then our interface is wrong. In that case I wrote it so I think I can plead guilty to the mistake ;-) In hindsight, but I don't have the stammina to do a tree-wide change, I think we should have differenciated: of_find_xxx which does *not* drop the reference of_find_next_xxx which does Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
