On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:22:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:59:57AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > Hi Shawn, > > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:02:49AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:07:08PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > > > This series of patches need to be applied into one single tree because > > > > the second patch depends on the first one. Without it, SSI would playback > > > > constant noise to the right channel when playback monaural audio files on > > > > i.MX6 Series board. > > > > > > Let me try to understand if the dependency is true. > > > > > > Saying I apply the DTS patch on IMX tree while Mark apply the fsl_ssi > > > patch on his tree, will there be any regression on either IMX tree or > > > Mark's tree? The monaural playback on imx6qdl never worked, so it's not > > > a regression. If there is no regression on either tree, there is no > > > dependency to maintain. > > > > It's fair enough to understand in this way. It looks like I misunderstood > > the dependency here. > > > > Do I need to resend them separately? > > No, I will just pick up the DTS patch with some testing. > > Shawn Thank you. Nicolin Chen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
