On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 07:24:04PM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Well, the label is just for the parser and it does not get into the DTB.
> This is where the DTS author can make things up just for their own
> convenience (like main_codec, aux_codec or even cs42l52).
If only we could have comments :)
> I know this is really more bikeshedding than anything useful, but I'd
> rather try to follow the written rules in ePAPR, instead of nothing at
> all. At least just to make things more consistent.
My feeling here is that we should be looking more critically at ePAPR -
if we're picking people up for having what's essentially a comment
that's too specific we're probably doing something wrong especially
since the corrected example would look something like:
codec: codec@12 {
which is a bit redundant.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
