2016년 03월 23일 07:52에 Heiko Stübner 이(가) 쓴 글: > Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae: >> + Ajay kumar with Samsung email >> >> Hi, >> >> 2016년 03월 23일 07:12에 Heiko Stübner 이(가) 쓴 글: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am Dienstag, 22. März 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: >>>> On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang >>>>> <caesar.upstream@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> wrote: >>>> Same here, this is the second time I tested this series (first time was >>>> v6 on October 25 [2]) and I think that has been out there for too long. >>>> >>>>> Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> So we have 3 tests (Doug, Caesar and me) for the Rockchip side as well as >>> Javier for the Exynos side based on the most recent drm state. >>> >>> As said by a lot of people it would be cool to get this merged soon - >>> hopefully directly after -rc1. The only remaining question is through >>> which >>> tree it should go. >>> >>> I guess there are two basic options: >>> - Inki takes the series - we could see the Rockchip-Ack being implied but >>> maybe Mark can provide an explicit one >>> - Mark takes the series with an Ack from Inki for the shared parts >>> >>> Inki, Mark do you have a preference? >> >> The problem would be that there is no drm bridge maintainer. I think the >> most suitable person as the maintainer would be Ajay Kumar who is an author >> of drm bridge framework. Of course, I could take them and have pull-request >> again. But it seems a little late. Dave had already pull-request. > > I really meant that for 4.7, not for the current merge window. I just want to > make sure it goes into a maintainer tree shortly after v4.6-rc1, before > something else changes the exynos-dp again :-). > > >> To Ajay, >> How about adding you as a drm bridge maintainer? DRM SoC driver maintainers >> would need a person who can manage the drm bridge relevant pathes. > > The previous example (dw_hdmi generalization between imx and rockchip) did > just go through the imx tree. So either the Samsung or Rockchip drm-trees > might be enough? In this case, someone else may send an email again like you "who is going to merge?" That would be why we need a maintainer. drm panel is already managed well by Thierry Reding without such confusion. Thanks, Inki Dae > > > Heiko > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
