On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:21:53PM -0800, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:09:44PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote: > > > The thermal-sensor property of the thermal zone node accepts phandles to > > > thermal sensors. However, thermal zones can be created as an > > > + > > > + thermal-sensors = <&cpu_thermal &gpu_thermal &lcd_thermal> > > > > This seems inconsistent. Why can a thermal zone only have multiple > > thermal sensors when they are thermal zones themselves? Either we assume > > that one thermal zone has a single sensor or we assume that it can have > > multiple sensors, but this should not depend on the zone being a sub zone > > or not. > > > > I think the thermal-sensors property should always point to one or > > multiple sensors. I see no point in "This property either points to > > exactly one sensor or multiple other thermal zones (from which we only > > use the temperature)" > > > Agreed here. In fact, if we are going to allow thermal zones to be > treated as sensors, it means there should be no limits on what you put > of there, as long as all items have #thermal-sensor-cells. So, mixing > one (or more) regular sensors, with other thermal zones shall be > allowed, if we agree in this semantics. Eduardo, thanks for the review. There doesn't seem to be much interest in this and I currently have no time to work on it so I am dropping this series for the time being. I'm happy for this to be picked up by somebody else (or who knows, maybe I will be able to work on it again in the future). Javi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
