On 11/11/2013 01:31 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Follow arm,smmu's "mmu-masters" binding.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra30-smmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra30-smmu.txt
> +- mmu-masters : A list of phandles to device nodes representing bus
> + masters for which the SMMU can provide a translation
> + and their corresponding StreamIDs (see example below).
> + Each device node linked from this list must have a
> + "#stream-id-cells" property, indicating the number of
> + StreamIDs(swgroup ID) associated with it, which is defined
> + in "include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra-swgroup.h".
Some of those lines are indented with TABs, others with spaces.
> + mmu-masters = <&host1x TEGRA_SWGROUP_HC>,
> + <&mpe TEGRA_SWGROUP_MPE>,
> + <&vi TEGRA_SWGROUP_VI>,
> + <&epp TEGRA_SWGROUP_EPP>,
> + <&isp TEGRA_SWGROUP_ISP>,
> + <&gr2d TEGRA_SWGROUP_G2>,
> + <&gr3d TEGRA_SWGROUP_NV TEGRA_SWGROUP_NV2>,
So right now, the driver is statically assigning clients to a couple of
specific ASIDs. What if we want to configure that mapping from DT; does
that make sense? Instead of mmu-masters being a list of <phandle
streamid*>, should it be <phandle ASID streamid*> or <phandle (streamid
ASID)*>?
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> struct smmu_client {
...
> - u32 hwgrp;
> + u64 hwgrp;
I think that's used later with for_each_set_bit() etc. Should it be
declared as an explicit bitmap object, or at least an unsigned long to
directly match the bitmap APIs?
Related, what if someone bumps <dt-bindings/memory/tegra-swgroup.h>'s
TEGRA_SWGROUP_MAX to 96 without changing the code?
> static int smmu_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev)
...
> - client = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(*c), GFP_KERNEL);
> + client = find_smmu_client(smmu, dev->of_node);
> if (!client)
... (deletions of replaced code)
> return -EINVAL;
-ENODEV cursorily sounds better? Same in smmu_iommu_add_device().
> @@ -1238,6 +1311,23 @@ static int tegra_smmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> + i = 0;
> + smmu->clients = RB_ROOT;
> + while (true) {
> + err = of_parse_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "mmu-masters",
> + "#stream-id-cells", i, &args);
> + if (err)
> + break;
An iterator macro similar to of_property_for_each_u32/string() might be
nicer, which could replace all that with:
of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "mmu-masters",
"#stream-id-cells") {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
