On 12-11-2013 15:59, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Eduardo Valentin > <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> wrote: >> After discussion and agreement of thermal device tree bindings, >> it is desirable to properly maintain thermal bindings for >> existing and upcoming devices. >> >> As original author of thermal device tree bindings, I am >> volunteering to maintain them. >> >> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index 3438384..94bfc46 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -6178,6 +6178,7 @@ M: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx> >> M: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >> M: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> M: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> +M: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> >> L: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> S: Maintained >> F: Documentation/devicetree/ > > The number of device-tree maintainers is getting to be somewhat silly. > You don't have to be a maintainer to be a reviewer, and the number is > getting large enough that it might get hard for one maintainer to know > what another is doing. > > So, soft nack, but it's really up to the DT guys. Hello Olof, No issues on my side. As I stated in the patch description, I am volunteering. The motivation comes from the fact that it's been hard to get DT maintainers attention, so I am assuming they are not having enough bandwidth to pay attention to an extra class of bindings. I agree with you, this is up to the DT folks. > > > -Olof > > -- You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport) Eduardo Valentin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
