On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 07:23:23PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hey Rob, > > > > I'm seeing tons of dtc spam with make dtbs (about 23k lines > > with multi_v7_defconfig!) with commit fa38a82096a1 ("scripts/dtc: > > Update to upstream version 53bf130b1cdd"). > > > > Introducing something like this few days with merge window > > about to open seems to be in the "a bit intrusive" category > > to me :) > > > > Probably some of these changes should be reverted? > > It is in -next, but I'm not planning to send to Linus this cycle. Then it shouldn't be in -next. -next is a tree for integration testing and conflict discovery for the upcoming merge window, and should only contain code targetted at that merge window. Here's a reminder of sfr's boilerplate which lays this out: Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As you may know, this is not a judgment of your code. The purpose of linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have been: * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's Signed-off-by, * posted to the relevant mailing list, * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), * successfully unit tested, and * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. It seems it doesn't satisfy the last point there. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html