> -----Original Message----- > From: Lars-Peter Clausen [mailto:lars@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 6:10 PM > To: Shubhrajyoti Datta; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Soren Brinkmann; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Michal Simek; > broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; Shubhrajyoti Datta > Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] bindings: spi: Add clock entries for spi-xilinx > > On 03/10/2016 01:11 PM, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > [...] > > @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ Required properties: > > - interrupts : Property with a value describing the interrupt > > number. > > - interrupt-parent : Must be core interrupt controller > > +- clocks: Input clock specifier. Refer to common clock bindings. > > +- clock-names: tuple listing input clock names. > > + Required elements: "spi_fclk" > > Sorry for being pedantic, but the core has two clock input "" and > "ext_spi_clk". Which one is "spi_fclk"? However for all my designs I adhere to the recommendation see below both are from the same clock source. I named it spi_fclk. Do you think I should have 2 clocks requests on the same clock. http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ip_documentation/axi_quad_spi/v2_00_a/ds843_axi_quad_spi.pdf page 12 15. It is recommended that the AXI4 interface clock and EXT_SPI_CLK clock originate from the same clock source. > > - Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
