Sachin Kamat wrote:
>
> Added a binding example for reference and updated the
> node name. While at it also removed the name description
> as it is not necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> * Removed node name description as suggested by Tomasz Figa.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt
> index 5039c0a12f55..0ab3251a6ec2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,12 @@
> SAMSUNG S5P/Exynos SoC series System Registers (SYSREG)
>
> Properties:
> - - name : should be 'sysreg';
> - compatible : should contain "samsung,<chip name>-sysreg", "syscon";
> For Exynos4 SoC series it should be "samsung,exynos4-sysreg",
"syscon";
> - reg : offset and length of the register set.
> +
> +Example:
> + syscon@10010000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4-sysreg", "syscon";
> + reg = <0x10010000 0x400>;
> + };
> --
> 1.7.9.5
Looks OK to me.
DT guys, shall I pick this into Samsung tree or not?
Thanks,
Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
