Jassi, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: [...] >> I can make it compatible for today's SoC, but based on what i explained, >> how about just "rx_<qid>" for the interrupt names? >> interrupt-names = "rx_005", "rx_057" (I kinda feel using "irq" for >> interrupt-names is actually redundant information)? >> > Feel free to name the interrupts "rx_" instead of "irq_" ... assuming > the interrupts correspond to only reception of data. > Thanks for your reviews. I have now posted a v2: hopefully these meet the needs. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8442641/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8442671/ -- --- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
