On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 06:53:13 -0800, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Pantelis, > > On 11/06/2013 01:34 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > > > > > As I mentioned earlier I'm trying to get this accepted in general term and then we'll > > get around fixing any minor problems. > > > > I think it is quite likely at this point that your series will be accepted. > > However, from my experience with larger submissions like this one, it is quite common > that the maintainers ask for all feedback to be addressed before that happens - > especially for feedback like this, where there is common understanding that some > changes to the code are necessary. > > Maybe the device tree maintainers could chime in at this point and let us all know > what will need to happen to get the series accepted. Since it is a big series, I would like to be able to "front-load" the series of changes with straighforward changes that are easy to merge. There are some exceptions though, such as when new APIs with users later in the series. I don't really want to pull in a new API separately from the user most of the time. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
