[ reduced the CC: list to device tree people ] On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 16:12 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:59:06AM +0100, Arun Kumar K wrote: > > > > +Required properties: > > + > > +- compatible : must be "samsung,exynos5250-fimc" > > +- clocks : list of clock specifiers, corresponding to entries in > > + the clock-names property > > Minor nit: clocks are references by phandle + clock-specifier pairs, as > the clock-specifier is separate from the phandle to the clock. Out of interest, and to learn the correct terminology for future reference, I thought I'd ask: Are the integer cells _the_ "specifier" which complements the "phandle"? Or does the "specifier" _consist_ of a phandle _and_ a (potentially empty) set of integer cells which all together uniqely specify the resource? For clocks and gpios I would tend towards the latter model, it feels more intuitive to me. I always felt interrupts to be the exception in that their parent and the integer cells are spread across individual properties. Which in itself poses a limitation, and I've seen patches trying to bring those two parts of the specification together, such that members of a list of interrupts can reference items from different parents. virtually yours Gerhard Sittig -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@xxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
