On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 03:26:23PM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:14:50PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 08:06:17AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > > > > > +static void fw_cfg_io_cleanup(void) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + if (fw_cfg_is_mmio) { > > > > > + iounmap(fw_cfg_dev_base); > > > > > + release_mem_region(fw_cfg_p_base, fw_cfg_p_size); > > > > > + } else { > > > > > + ioport_unmap(fw_cfg_dev_base); > > > > > + release_region(fw_cfg_p_base, fw_cfg_p_size); > > > > > + } > > > > > +} > > > > > + > > > > > +/* arch-specific ctrl & data register offsets are not available in ACPI, DT */ > > > > > > > > So for all arches which support ACPI, I think this driver > > > > should just rely on ACPI. > > > > > > There was a discussion about that a few versions ago, and IIRC the > > > conclusion was not to expect the firmware to contend for fw_cfg access > > > after the guest kernel boots: > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/5/283 > > > > > > > So it looks like NVDIMM at least wants to pass label data to guest - > > for which fw cfg might be a reasonable choice. > > > > I suspect things changed - fw cfg used to be very slow but we now have > > DMA interface which makes it useful for a range of applications. Comment on this? I'm really worried we'll release linux without a way to access fw cfg from aml. How about taking acpi lock around all accesses? > > > (I even had a prototype version doing what you suggested, but per the above > > > reference decided to drop it -- which IMHO is for the better, since otherwise > > > I'd have had to ifdef between ACPI and non-ACPI versions of the driver -- > > > see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/4/534 ) > > > > I'm not sure why you have these ifdefs - they are on the host, are they > > not? > > Think of those as "pseudocode" ifdefs, they're there to distinguish > between AML that would be generated on MMIO vs. IOPORT systems > (specifically, arm vs. x86, respectively) > > Some of the AML is the same, but obviously the _CRS, and > OperationRegion + Field are different, and I wanted to point that out > somehow :) > > Cheers, > --Gabriel You can do ifs as well. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html