Hello Michael, On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:36:49 -0800, Michael Turquette wrote: > > Yay, new SoC! Just FYI, we worked out an agreement in December[0] that > > the clk git tree can take DT bindings and headers, and we'll always host > > them in an immutable branch by default in case arm-soc (or anyone else) > > needs them. Stephen and I are doing this now. > > Oops, I misunderstood your point (and I should have looked at the > patches before replying). The patches in this series do indeed have > the clk DT binding descriptions. > > Pardon the noise, nothing to see here, move along ;-) Yes, each driver comes with its DT binding documentation in the same patch. Unfortunately, some maintainers prefer to have the DT binding documentation as separate patches from the driver itself, while some other maintainers prefer to have both in the same patch. And I never remember which maintainer has which preference. So, let me know if you're fine with having both in the same patches. If not, I can respin by splitting the DT binding documentation in its own patches. Other than that, any comments on the drivers themselves? Since they are quite trivial, I would ideally like to see them in 4.6, if at all possible. Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
