On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add documentation for new separate CMT0 and CMT1 DT compatible strings > for R-Car Gen2. These compat strings allow us to enable CMT1-specific > features in the driver. The old compat strings will be deprecated in > the not so distant future. > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Changes since V2: > - Added Acked-by from Rob > - Removed Tested-by tag from DT binding patch - duh! > > Changes since V1: > - Added Acked-by and Tested-by from Geert > - Added Acked-by from Laurent > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,cmt.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > --- 0002/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,cmt.txt > +++ work/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,cmt.txt 2015-09-17 17:26:57.440513000 +0900 > @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ Required Properties: > (CMT1 on sh73a0 and r8a7740) > This is a fallback for the above renesas,cmt-48-* entries. > > + - "renesas,cmt0-rcar-gen2" for 32-bit CMT0 devices included in R-Car Gen2. > + - "renesas,cmt1-rcar-gen2" for 48-bit CMT1 devices included in R-Car Gen2. (advancing a few months always means more comments ;-) I'm wondering whether we should use e.g. "renesas,rcar-gen2-cmt0" instead? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html