On 16/02/16 06:40, Dirk Behme wrote:
On 15.02.2016 21:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:Add the missing "cache-unified" and "cache-level" properties to the Cortex-A57 cache-controller node. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> --- v3: - Remaining part of "[PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: renesas: r8a7795: Add L2 cache-controller nodes", after dropping the "arm,data-latency" and "arm,tag-latency" properties. --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi index b5e46e4ff72ad003..c07f4e83b988ba42 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ L2_CA57: cache-controller@0 { compatible = "cache"; + cache-unified; + cache-level = <2>;As this is completely unused on ARMv8 I don't think that we want to have these unused entries in the DT. Sudeep: What do you think?
I am fine with that, I don't see any issue having them as they are static values and highly unlikely to change and hence no threat to backward compatibility. The main concern I had with latency values is that it's currently not used anywhere but if we decide to use say in secure software, having the untested/early values in DT might cause compatibility issues in future as they were added much before the actual understanding of it's usage. So I prefer to defer them until then. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
