On 15.02.2016 22:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> >> In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level. >> Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc", > > Yes, I noticed this but as you said not all DTSI have a soc node > and that's why I made it top level in the DTSI. > >> some not. Anyway I think we should move to "soc" version. >> > > Not sure I'm following, did you mean to do it as a follow up or > to add a soc node for the missing DTSI as a part of this series? I meant to send a v2 with this under "soc" node even though on some DTS we do not have the "soc". Optional follow up would be to make DTS consistent and move nodes under "soc"... but that would be also a lot of churn. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
