On 09/02/2016 13:41, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:40:36PM +0100, John Crispin wrote: > >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "mediatek,mt6323-regulator" > > I'm really not happy with MFD subfunctions like this which add no > information over the parent device name appearing directly in the > binding, it results in us putting Linux specifics about how we split the > device up into the driver. It's not like this could realistically be > used separately to the parent device. Just have the MFD create the > device directly or if the individual regulators are reusable IPs which > can share a driver then describe them as such in the DT. > Hi Mark, How would you like it to be. i am failing to understand that from your comment. John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
