On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 06:44:19PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the > > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the specific arm- > > tree. But if you really want to take the whole series, for patches 4,5,6 > Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't be > a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go thru > ARM tree. Not for the DT stuff - since the DT is supposed to be a stable ABI there really shouldn't be any hard dependencies on things outside the DT. > Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not > provided.. It's the norm for DT stuff.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
