On 08/02/16 13:13, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:28:39PM +0000, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> On 03/02/16 11:59, Juri Lelli wrote: > >>> +bool arch_wants_init_cpu_capacity(void) >>> +{ >>> + return true; > >> Isn't this a little bit too simple? Not every ARM/ARM64 platform is a >> heterogeneous one. > > Does it matter? Is there any problem with doing the callibration and > having it say that all the CPUs performs very similarly? My > understanding was that this was simply saying it was worth checking to > see if there was some asymmetry. > No, the calibration would work on any platform. I can see your point, you want to have this feature not depend on dt. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html