On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/05/2016 04:32 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> + for (i = 0; i < m; i++) >>>>> + writel_relaxed(buf[i], addr); >>>> >>>> writesl() ? >>> >>> Hm, maybe. Does it really have the same semantics? >> >> It's a loop inside, so it has a count parameter. Otherwise it should be similar. > It seems to have different semantics in terms of endianness and ordering. Ouch, I was totally under impression that they are done in a way of write*/read*. >> Maybe the hardware flow control implementation is needed? > > But wouldn't that be transfer_one_message? Depends how many common stuff we might have. For now it is indeed. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
