Hi Mark, On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:28:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > I guess a separate driver would make it easier to deal with cases like > > the one you suggested (shutting down when the load is going to be > > lower). I don't see how we could have a good DT representation of that > > if we're going to use lists. > > We can have a driver regardless of what the DT looks like, it's a > question of how things get instantiated. > > > Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you > > prefer. > > Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say. Just to make sure we're on the same page: you want to keep the regulator, but instead of giving the parent through vinX-supplies properties, you want to have a single *-supply property, with a list of regulators, right? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
