On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:20:54PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:00:58PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > Consequently, any extensions to the PPI or SPI interrupt specifiers must > > be able to work with random crap from legacy DTs, effectively > > necessitating a new interrupt type in the first cell. Sigh. > > I'm not sure that's true if we allocate a new value for the 1st cell for > "extended" PPI or SPI interrupt-sepcficiers (which presumably add > restrictions). That would also allow old kernels to safely skip such > interrupts rather than mis-parsing them. Right, that's what I said :) > > This patch fixes the text so that additional, reserved cells are > > required to be zero. This looks like a reasonable thing to require and > > is already satisifed by the .dts files in-tree. > > > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > > This patch itself makes sense, so FWIW: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > > Any proposed extention to the binding requires its own discussion. Yup. Marc -- can you queue this please? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
