On 2/1/2016 11:29 AM, Eric Auger wrote: >> hanks, we should ask Baptiste to get his email into the Maintainer file list. > I think it is: > ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl > 0001-vfio-platform-add-support-for-ACPI-while-detecting-t.patch > > Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:VFIO > PLATFORM DRIVER,commit_signer:1/5=20%) > Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:VFIO > DRIVER,commit_signer:2/3=67%,commit_signer:4/5=80%) > ../.. Strange, I'll reset my tree. >> > >>> >> >>> >> On my side I tested with of amd xgbe and I don't observe any regression. >>> >> >>> >> Best Regards >> > >> > Can I add your tested by? > Well to make things clear I did not test the ACPI part. I just can tell > this does not bring any regression on the of part. But I am not against > if you don't find anybody else and you tested the ACPI part ;-) > How about? of-tested-by: ... Shanker and I tested ACPI before pushing the patches to the list and we also posted the corresponding QEMU patches as well to the qemu-devel maillist. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/575878/ I'll ask him to add his acpi-tested-by for the ACPI part. > Best Regards -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
