On Monday 01 February 2016 02:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Monday 01 February 2016 01:55 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
This depends on patch
[PATCH V2] mfd: core: add macro for adding mfd cells
and due to absence of this patch, it reports the error.
If you have dependencies, why aren't they in this set?
This change is not related to the series as such and so independent.
I just thought that mentioning on commit log will be fine here. May
be I missed some points here.
If you have patches which use/depend on it, then it's not so
independent, right?
Hmm.. true. I had different thought that the core header is independent
as it does not depends on other but this series dependent which depends
on core header. Seems something I missed.
Idea was to review md header independently and used on this series.
Let me know if I need to add this to back on series.
In order to avoid any mishaps, that would be preferable, yes.
I will respin this series to V8 once I will have change from you per
discussion on other email.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
