* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [160127 03:19]: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > In my opinion this patch is not support for new hardware. It just add > > missing DT definition for one specific board for HW which was added to > > linux kernel in v4.2-rc1 version. For me it looks like that needed DT > > definition was forgotten... > > Opinions differ, but ultimately it's up to whoever is responsible for > accepting the patch, and in the case of ARM SoC based patches, the > arm-soc maintainers. Yeah. Sorry for long delay as discussed. I'm applying the $subject patch finally into omap-for-v4.6/dt today. We still have at least two fixes left to go that both affect also n900. But at least I can now sanely test adding new stuff with a WIP fix for the PM runtime regression. > The arm-soc maintainers close their trees for development changes a > few weeks before hand (a patch of mine which was acked etc by 7th > December never made the 4.5 merge window either, and the alleged > reason I've been told is because arm-soc was already closed by then). Heh I too have some pending clock framework patches from December that I did not repost yet as the maintainers notified that they rather not take new stuff any longer for v4.5 before the holidays. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
